Why is it safe to arbitrate?

arbitration

Why is it safe to arbitrate?

The Family Court is strongly in support of the parties using Arbitration as a means of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for financial matters so that cases can reach resolution in a speedier manner.  Partner Liz Cowell explains.

 

18 months into the Covid-19 crisis and practitioners are finding that contested proceedings for financial settlement following a divorce are taking many months, if not years, to resolve.

This is partially because the Family Court is flooded with urgent Children Act cases and applications for protection from domestic violence.  These cases are understandably given precedents over financial matters and have increased during the pandemic.

Consent Order

The process itself to obtain financial relief from the court is a one-size-fits-all, the parties having to attend at least two court hearings before the case proceeds to trial, when they find themselves unable to agree a Consent Order.

Due to the overburdened family list, hearings are frequently “bumped” usually for the benefit of urgent Children Act proceedings.

Arbitration

It is the case that the Family Court itself is strongly in support of the parties using Arbitration as a means of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for financial matters so that cases can reach resolution in a speedier manner.  When an arbitration takes place, an award is made by the arbitrator which is then turned into a Consent Order which the court will ratify.

The advantages of using arbitration is that it provides complete privacy, there is consistency, it is a speedier process and although the arbitrator needs to be paid it is cost efficient as there needs to be far less attendance at court and the process can be fine tuned to each and every separate application.

The Family Court’s support for arbitration could not be more clearly set out than in a recent High Court decision of Mr Justice Mostyn A -v- A [2021] EWHC1889 (FAM).

In this case the husband, who had agreed to arbitrate then chose not to be bound by the arbitrator’s decision and tried to get the matter set aside, using an expensive route to appeal to the High Court.  He failed.  Mr Justice Mostyn set out clearly in his judgment the correct way to pursue a challenge to an award – and he also found for the wife.

Hopefully his decision will help to persuade the parties that the process of arbitration provides closure, and the common excuse of some practitioners – that there is no proper means of appeal – has been finally put to bed.

Mostyn J emphasised a previous High Court decision of Lady Justice King in Hayley -v- Hayley [2020] EWCACIV1369 which confirms that a “challenge to an arbitral award should be dealt with broadly the same way and subject to the same principles as a financial remedy appeal in the Family Court from a District Judge to a Circuit Judge” and that this was how he was going to proceed to deal with the husband’s various applications before him.  He helpfully added an Appendix to his judgment which gives clear guidance to practitioners as to how to challenge an Arbitral Award, thus giving practitioners protection before proceeding in this manner.

If you are affected by any of the issues raised here, please do get in touch today. We are here to help you.

I want a divorce: your step-by-step guide

divorce procedure heather

I want a divorce: your step-by-step guide

“I want a divorce.” But what is the process – what do you need to know? Heather Lucy, family law solicitor, is here to help you with a step-by-step guide covering the divorce procedure.

Special Procedure

Don’t be frightened by this term.  All it means is that when you apply for a divorce in England and Wales, the process, in the vast majority of undefended cases (that is, a case where one of you wants to divorce and the other does not oppose), is called Special Procedure.  All this means is that a judge will consider the divorce petition on paper and neither you nor your spouse will need to attend court to explain why your marriage has broken down.

Please bear in mind there is no such thing as a “quickie” divorce, no matter how many times you might read about this in the media. If you want more details on the length of time a divorce might take, please take a look here.

It’s also important to remember that the reason for the breakdown of your marriage rarely impacts on how the finances are divided.  It is a common misconception for example that adultery makes a difference – more details here. The court will deal with the financial consequences of the end of the marriage separately from the process of obtaining the divorce itself. You do not need to wait to resolve financial arrangements before divorcing, but you should not divorce without first getting advice how it may affect you – I really want to stress this point.

Before you apply for a divorce, you will need either your original marriage certificate or certified copy, as well as a certified translation if your marriage was abroad and the document is not in English.

Applying for a divorce

The divorce procedure is started by sending to the court a divorce application known as the Petition. The party making the application is known as the Petitioner, the receiving party is known as the Respondent, and either party to the marriage can apply to the court for a divorce.

Where possible, we will try to agree with your spouse which party will initiate the process and the grounds for divorce.  This will then allow the divorce procedure to continue on an undefended basis.

Grounds for divorce

There is only one ground for divorce, namely that the marriage has “irretrievably broken down”. To evidence this, the petitioner (applicant) for the divorce will need to rely upon one of

The Five Facts

In the Petition, the Petitioner has to prove that the marriage has irretrievably broken down by evidencing one of five specific statutory facts:

– Adultery

– Unreasonable behaviour

– Desertion (in practice, this is rare, and difficult to prove)

– two years’ separation with agreement by both that there should be a divorce

– five years’ separation (the consent of the Respondent is not needed)

The most common facts relied upon are adultery, or unreasonable behaviour.

The Decree Nisi

Once the divorce petition is issued by the court, it is sent to the Respondent who then usually has 14 days (possibly longer if the Respondent doesn’t live in the UK) to complete return the Acknowledgement of Service to the court.

The court will then send a copy of the Acknowledgement to the Petitioner who then completes and files an Application for Decree Nisi and a supporting Statement.

When the papers are received by the court they will be considered by a judge who, if satisfied with the ground for divorce, will issue a Certificate of Entitlement for Decree Nisi. This will list a hearing date several weeks later, at which the Decree Nisi will be pronounced. This hearing can also be used to consider any applications for or objections to any costs orders sought, if not already agreed.

Do bear in mind that the Decree Nisi is actually an interim stage in the divorce procedure – it isn’t the final divorce, it is a document that says that the court does not see any reason why you cannot divorce.  Once you have your Decree Nisi, you can apply for the

Decree Absolute

Usually, the Petitioner waits until the finances have been agreed and approved by the Court before applying for the final decree of divorce, known as the Decree Absolute.  If the divorce has taken place before the finances are resolved and one of the parties dies then, potentially, benefits to which the other would have been entitled to by virtue of the marriage will be lost (an obvious example is a spouse’s pension).

International divorce procedure

Some people may be entitled to begin divorce proceedings in more than one country: if that is the case, we can assist in helping you to decide which is the better jurisdiction for you (and your family) as the divorce process varies widely from country to country, even within Europe, including as to financial outcome, timing and arrangements for your children. Speed can be of the essence in making the decision.  If you think this might apply to your situation, please do get in touch without delay.

Respectful divorce

Finally, I’d like to stress that here at McAlister Family Law we believe very strongly in achieving what we call a respectful divorce, wherever possible.  Our managing partner, Amanda McAlister, has spoken about this extensively in the media and shares her advice here as to the best way forward for couples who are divorcing.

If you are affected by any of the issues raised here, please do get in touch today. We are here to help you.

Should I name the other person in my adultery petition?

can I name the other person in my adultery petition

Should I name the other person in my adultery petition?

This is a question we are often asked when a client first comes to us to talk about filing for divorce. Often that client is feeling angry and hurt.

Georgia Smith take a look at this challenging issue.

In simple terms, the divorce petition effectively sets out the petitioner’s reasons as to why the marriage has irretrievably broken down. In cases of adultery, it may be perceived that a third party is the sole reason for the breakdown, which is why the question “should I name the person who my partner committed adultery with in my petition?” is asked.

The straightforward answer is no.

It is not normally in your best interests to name the other man or woman in your divorce petition, even if you are divorcing on the sole basis of adultery. This advice can be a tough pill to swallow for most, who understandably wish to allocate blame after experiencing such feelings of hurt and betrayal.

It is usually enough for the petitioner (the person making the application for divorce) to provide the particulars of when the adultery took place and whether that relationship is ongoing. The respondent will then be served with a copy of the petition and will be asked to complete an acknowledgement of service form, which will ask if they admit to the adultery. Alternatively, your solicitor may request that the respondent complete a confession statement.

However, it may be the case that the respondent refuses to admit the adultery and the petitioner will have to prove the fact on a balance of probabilities.

What if I name the co-respondent?

Naming a third party in your divorce petition will make that person a co-respondent to your divorce. In practice, it is very rare for this to happen, as the Family Procedure Rules 2010 state that the third party should not be named unless the petitioner believes the respondent will contest the proceedings.

Significantly, naming a co-respondent could delay matters, as the third party will be served a copy of the petition and will be asked to fill out a form in response. If that third party proceeds to instruct a solicitor, your costs will only increase.

It is often wrongly assumed that adultery will be taken into consideration by the Court when determining financial settlement. This is not the case, and the judge can often take a dim view of a spouse who insists on naming a co-respondent.

In reality, naming a co-respondent only increases contention and may even cause the respondent to decide to defend the divorce. The urge to ‘name and shame’ can be short-lived and the real victory is in obtaining an amicable and swift divorce.

If you are affected by any of the issues outlined here, please get in touch today. We are here to help.

Do I need my ex’s permission to take my children on holiday?

permission to take children on holiday

Do I need my ex's permission to take my children on holiday?

The schools are breaking up now for the summer, and as certain travel restrictions are being lifted, for some of us that may mean the excitement of travelling abroad on holiday.  But if you are separated from your child’s other parent, this can bring issues which need to be addressed with your ex-partner prior to any trip away, particularly if you’re considering holidaying in what is currently deemed to be an “amber” country.

Associate Therasa Kenny explains.

If there is an Order in place, usually a Child Arrangements Order (formerly a Residence Order) then a child can be taken abroad for up to a month without needing the written consent of the other parent.

Parental Responsibility

If there is not a court order in place, what first needs to be considered is whether you have parental responsibility.  If both parents share parental responsibility, then what is often overlooked is that you will need to get written consent from the other parent in order to take your child out of the United Kingdom (Section 13 (2) of the Children Act 1989).  Failing to do so could lead to you committing an offence of abduction for which you can be fined, imprisoned or both.

Should consent be unreasonably withheld, then an application to Court can be made.  The Judge will take into account the individual circumstances of each family, and if permission is given (which it often is) then specific travel details will need to be provided.  These will include the dates of travel, address details for where the child will be staying and any flight numbers.

The Court rarely denies permission to take a child on holiday abroad where there is an existing relationship between the parent and child and the plans are reasonable in all of the circumstances. Where they do, it is usually in circumstances where the plans are patently not in the child’s best interests or where the Court deems the child may not be returned to the country.

The child’s best interests

If only the mother has parental responsibility, and again there are no Court orders in place, then permission is not necessarily needed to take a child abroad on holiday.  That being said, and with your child’s best interests at heart, consultation should always take place with the other parent (if they are in regular contact with the child) in order to reach an agreement that is right for everyone.   As a father without parental responsibility, should you not agree to your child being taken abroad, you can apply to the Court for a Parental Responsibility Order and a Prohibited Steps Order to prevent the trip.

What if my children’s grandparents want to take them abroad on holiday?

Should other members of the family, such as a grandparent, wish to take a child abroad, then it is worth noting that permission will be needed from both parents who have parental responsibility, and not just from one.  Again, it’s really helpful if you can maintain good relationships with everyone in your extended family, but if that isn’t the case, then we recommend getting good legal advice well in advance of any proposed trip.

What if my child has a surname different from my own?

You also need to be aware that customs officers may insist on extra checks where a child is travelling with somebody who has a different surname to them. In these circumstances and in order to avoid any hold ups, it is always useful to take additional documents to the airport with you which can help to verify your child’s connection to you, such as the child’s birth certificate (which may provide the details of both parents’ surnames) and/or your marriage certificate (which will show the surnames before the marriage) and any existing court order and so on.

Open lines of communication

What is important is communication, and trying to agree any travel arrangements between you and the other parent in advance.  This is not always possible, but if it can be achieved, it will avoid any applications to the court being necessary.

If you are affected by any of the issues raised here, please get in touch today. We are here to help.

We welcome two new recruits: Brigid O’Malley and Stephanie Eastwood

Left to right: Brigid O'Malley, Amanda McAlister and Stephanie Eastwood

We welcome two new recruits

We’re delighted to announce the recruitment of Brigid O’Malley as Associate and Stephanie Eastwood as solicitor. Both join the team in response to a significant increase in new enquires in both the divorce and finance and children law divisions.

 

Pictured left to right: Brigid O’Malley, Amanda McAlister and Stephanie Eastwood.

Beyond Group’s specialist Family and Children Law practice, McAlister Family Law, has announced the recruitment of Brigid O’Malley as Associate and Stephanie Eastwood as solicitor. Both join the team in response to a significant increase in new enquires in both the divorce and finance and children law divisions.

The practice has climbed the rankings in both Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners year on year; the Group has offices in Manchester city centre and throughout Cheshire. The two new appointees reflect the continued demand for its expertise both in divorce and finance and children law matters.

Brigid, who studied Law at Leeds Metropolitan (now Beckett) University, graduated in 2009 and completed her LPC at the College of Law in Chester in 2010, where she gained a distinction. She qualified as a solicitor in 2014, and acts on behalf of clients seeking advice and assistance in relation to family matters that includes divorce, financial proceedings, civil partnership dissolution, nullity, domestic abuse, and children proceedings. A key member of the Divorce and Finance team, she also has considerable experience in private children law.

Brigid is an accredited Police Station Representative and is also experienced in criminal law, having represented clients at Police stations and magistrates court, and instructing counsel at Crown Court, including handling cases involving serious sexual assault and violent crime. She is particularly experienced in assisting both victims and alleged perpetrators of domestic violence within the family.

Over the last twelve months, the award-winning McAlister Family Law has seen significant growth having recruited two specialist partners, four solicitors and three paralegals.

Said Brigid: “McAlister Family Law is a practice absolutely committed not only to divorce and related finance work, but also to the welfare of children through its unique specialist children teams. To have the opportunity of being able to work on both is incredible.”

Stephanie graduated from Liverpool John Moores University in 2016, where she went on to gain her LPC. She began her career as a paralegal whilst still at university, working first in the field of Personal Injury claims, before going on to specialise in Family Law. She has joined the practice’s specialist children team and will represent both children and parents on all matters including child abduction, child arrangements and adoption.

Stephanie said: “I’m thrilled to join such a forward-thinking family law practice, and to be part of the wider Beyond Group. McAlister Family Law is home to one of the countries’ leading children law practices, having more than eight solicitors on the Law Society Accredited children panel. I am so looking forward to working with such a highly regarded, specialist team.”

Amanda McAlister, managing partner of McAlister Family Law, added: “I’m delighted to welcome Brigid and Stephanie on board. Both are very talented family law solicitors and bring skills and experience that complement the already comprehensive offering here at McAlister Family Law. Like everyone within our practice, they are dedicated to delivering the very highest level of service to our clients.

“They will, I am sure, make a significant contribution to the team as we continue to grow as a practice and cement our reputation as one the UK’s leading family law practices.”

Beyond Group Head Matt Fleetwood said: “The recruitment of Brigid and Stephanie is further evidence of the Group’s strategic growth and most importantly, they are a perfect fit for the Group’s culture and values. McAlister Family Law has been extraordinarily successful since we established the practice three years ago, and it’s great to see it expand further with these new recruits.”

Can my ex make a claim against the assets and income I’ve generated since we separated?

business assets fiona wood

Can my ex make a claim against the assets and income I’ve generated since we separated?

Until a financial order is obtained within divorce proceedings either spouse can make a financial claim against the other. When considering what a fair financial claim is, a judge will look at all the assets owned by the couple at the time they divorce. What if one of the couple has significantly increased their assets since separation? Will their spouse benefit from this just because they did not divorce sooner after they separated?

Partner Fiona Wood, who is particularly accomplished at dealing with divorce cases where there are substantial and complex assets, explains further.

When marriages end the couple are not always in a rush to get divorced. Emotionally it is often a very difficult time and many people wait until after they have been separated for some time before formalising their separation by obtaining a divorce and a financial order within their divorce proceedings.

Until a financial order is obtained within divorce proceedings either spouse can make a financial claim against the other. When considering what a fair financial claim is, a judge will look at all the assets owned by the couple at the time they divorce. What if one of the couple has significantly increased their assets since separation? Will their spouse benefit from this just because they did not divorce sooner after they separated?

There are no strict rules regarding how a judge should divide the assets when a couple divorce

There are no strict rules regarding how a judge should divide the assets when a couple divorce, only guidelines. Judges therefore have a lot of discretion regarding the financial orders that they make. However, the main factor that judges must consider is the needs of the couple and their children (up to the age of 18). Need is usually having somewhere to live and money to live on, although how much is required to meet these needs will vary from case to case. If the couple’s needs can only be met by taking into account all of the assets, including those acquired after the couple separated, then all of the assets will go into the matrimonial pot for distribution between the couple.

Ring-fencing assets

If there are more than sufficient assets to meet the couple’s needs, it may be possible to ring-fence some or all of the assets that have been acquired after the couple separated. For example if one spouse started a new business after separation and at the time of the divorce this business had a significant value, if there are more than enough assets to meet the couple’s needs without taking the business into account, a judge could ignore some or all of the value of this business when dividing the other assets between the couple.

What if the asset existed at the time the couple were together, but it has increased in value significantly since separation? If the growth in value is just latent growth, such as an increase in value of a property owned by one of the couple as a result of a general increase in property prices, a judge is unlikely to say that this asset should be ring-fenced before the assets are divided between the couple.

If the growth in the asset since separation is as a result of significant efforts by one of the spouses since separation, for example a business increasing significantly in value over a period of time after separation due to a change in direction taken by the business owner, a judge may ring-fence some of the value in the business before the assets are divided between the couple. Some of the value of the business is likely to be included in the matrimonial pot as the business that existed at the time of separation provided a springboard for the growth of the business.

A judge’s discretion

When calculating how much should be ring-fenced, the Court of Appeal in Hart v Hart (2017) used both an arithmetical and a broad-brush approach to make this decision, which gives judges quite a large discretion regarding how they deal with this issue.

With regard to earnings that one spouse has earned after separation, again provided that there are sufficient assets to meet the couple’s needs without using money saved from post-separation income and bonuses, this money is likely to be ring-fenced. The case of Waggott v Waggott (2018) removed earning capacity from the matrimonial pot, allowing income received after separation to be treated differently if there are sufficient assets to meet the couple’s needs without having to use this money.

If you would like to know more about the issues raised here, please get in touch today. We are here to help.

Rylan Clark-Neal announces he and his husband of six years are to divorce

Rylan Clark-Neal to divorce

Rylan Clark-Neal and husband Dan are to divorce

The hugely popular television presenter Rylan Clark-Neal has announced he and his husband, Dan, are to divorce. In a statement released on 28 June, Rylan said: “I have made a number of mistakes which I deeply regret and have inevitably led to the breakdown of our marriage. I have taken time away from work as I am not in a good place at the moment and am seeking help.”

Our Managing Partner and award-winning family law expert Amanda McAlister explains how divorce in a same sex relationship will be enacted.

It is reported that Rylan’s well-publicised desire to have children, and Dan’s longing for a TV career, may well be the reason for the split, with insiders saying: “they just couldn’t resolve their differences”.

Whether this is true or not, one partner wanting children and the other wanting to focus on their career is certainly not an uncommon reason for a couple deciding their desire to pursue different life choices means they no longer wish to be together, and therefore filing for divorce.

Irretrievable breakdown

In the courts of England and Wales there is only one ground for divorce and that is the “irretrievable breakdown of the marriage” as set out in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.  What this means is that one or both parties to the marriage are not willing, or do not want, to continue living and being in a relationship with one another, having determined that the marriage is over for good.

Whilst there is one ground for divorce, there are five legally accepted facts (or reasons) for a divorce to take place.  Although a no-fault basis divorce is in the pipeline and legislation is planned for April 2022, unfortunately until then, we are still working on a fault-based system.

What are the Five Facts?

In the Petition, the Petitioner (the person who issues the divorce Petition) must prove that the marriage has broken down irretrievably by evidencing one of five, specific, statutory facts:

  • The Respondent’s adultery
  • The Respondent’s unreasonable behaviour
  • Desertion – the Respondent must have deserted the Petitioner for at least two years (in practice, this is rare, and difficult to prove)
  • two years’ separation with agreement by both that there should be a divorce
  • five years’ separation (the consent of the Respondent is not needed)

The most common facts relied upon are adultery, or unreasonable behaviour.

One crucial difference

There is, however, one crucial difference for same sex divorces as opposed to heterosexual divorces, and that is that adultery cannot be used in a same sex divorce. This is due to the current law defining adultery as when “your husband or wife has had sexual intercourse with someone else of the opposite sex”.

On that basis – that adultery can only be grounds for divorce where there has been sexual intercourse between two people of the opposite sex – sexual intimacy between two people of the same sex is not “adultery” for the purposes of obtaining a divorce, if one of those people is in a same sex marriage.

However, in same sex marriages, although adultery is not a ground for divorce, the infidelity could be used as an example of unreasonable behaviour.  Apart from the difference in the terms of the ground of a divorce, the application process is the same for same-sex and opposite-sex couples.

If you are affected by any of the issues raised here, please get in touch with one of our expert family lawyers today. We are here to help you.

Does having an affair affect your divorce settlement?

Matt Hancock affair

To what extent is an affair taken into account when dividing assets on divorce?

Over the past few days Matt Hancock’s resignation as health secretary over an affair with his aide Gina Coladangelo has played out in the full glare of the media. It is understood that Mr Hancock, a father of three, has left his wife of 15 years, Martha; his relationship with Ms Coladangelo is described as “serious”.

Partner and family law expert Caroline Bilous looks at the implications of Mr Hancock’s conduct, explaining to what extent an affair is taken into account when resolving the division of assets on divorce. 

The law, specifically the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 section 25(2)(g), says that a person’s conduct is taken into account only where

“…the conduct is such that it would in the opinion of the court be inequitable to disregard it.”

The law contained within this key piece of legislation was supplemented by the House of Lords decision in Miller v Miller and McFarlane v McFarlane in 2006 [2006] 1 FLR 1186 which provides that only in truly exceptional cases where conduct is “gross and obvious” will it be taken into account.

When is conduct taken into account? 

The law in England today does not enable a court to punish a person for their behaviour and instead the process is designed to achieve an outcome that has regard to all the circumstances of the case, one that mist give first consideration to the welfare of any child under the age of 18 and only in exceptional circumstances, where the assets are in excess of need will a parties conduct have an impact upon the outcome. It is important to note that need will be measured by assessing available financial resources and assessing the standard of living during the relationship and generally the longer the relationship’s duration the more important the standard of living will be.

In 1972,Wachtel v Wachtel [1973] EWCA Civ 10 Lord Denning made it clear that:

The court should not reduce its order for financial provision merely because of what was formerly regarded as guilt or blame.  To do so would be to impose a fine for supposed misbehaviour in the course of an unhappy married life.”

This is an extremely poignant extract and one that broadly sums up the courts approach to personal conduct today in that the role of the court is not to redress marital unhappiness and that such arguments have no place before the financial remedy courts.

In clear contrast however is where conduct takes the form of dissipation of assets by one party to the marriage causing a depletion in the assets available for division. The other party in this scenario would then seek to add back those assets that have been taken to redress such conduct.

For the court to add back assets that have been spent, the court has to be satisfied that there has been “wanton dissipation of assets”.  In Martin v Martin [1976] Fam 335, Cairns LJ said:

“A spouse cannot be allowed to fritter away the assets by extravagant living or reckless speculation and then to claim as great a share of what was left as he would have been entitled to if he had behaved reasonably.”

Bennet J in Norris v Norris [2003] 1 FLR 1142 said:

“…of course a spouse can spend his or her money as he or she chooses but it is only fair to add back into that spouse’s assets the amount by which he or she recklessly depletes the assets and thus potentially disadvantages the other spouse…”

Non-disclosure

There can also be issues of non-disclosure or a lack of financial transparency which could also fall within section 25 (2)(g) conduct.

In NG v SG (Appeal: Non-Disclosure) [2011] EWHC 3270 (Fam), Mostyn J stated that

“…the Court must be astute to ensure that a non-discloser should not be able to procure a result from his non-disclosure better than that which would be ordered if the truth were told. If the result is an order that is unfair to the non-discloser it is better that than that the Court should be drawn into making an order that is unfair to the Claimant”.

Therefore, while each case is treated entirely on its own merits and circumstances, as the law stands, an affair itself is highly unlikely to be taken into account when dividing assets on divorce. However to understand more about your rights our specialist team of family solicitors are here to help guide you through with a breadth of experience through these complex and difficult circumstances.

 

If you are affected by any of the issues raised here, please get in touch today. We are here to help.

McAlister Family Law awarded Highly Commended accolade at the Manchester Legal Awards

MLA Highly Commended

McAlister Family Law awarded Highly Commended accolade at the Manchester Legal Awards

We are delighted to announce that we been awarded the accolade Highly Commended in the Family Law Team of the Year category at the 2021 Manchester Legal Awards.

Amanda McAlister, our Managing Partner, said: “This is a huge achievement for our incredible team that has very much been in the trenches together this year.

“I could not be prouder of them all.”

Beyond Group’s specialist Family and Corporate practices promote four key individuals

Left to right Paul Reay, Jessica Horsman, Amanda McAlister, Matt Fleetwood, Jim Truscott, Angeliki Kotsidou and Aaron Williams

Beyond Group’s specialist Family and Corporate practices promote four key individuals

McAlister Family Law and Beyond Corporate continue to grow as Beyond Group announces annual promotions.

Beyond Group has announced four significant promotions across its specialist corporate law and family law practices.

The Group’s corporate law practice, Beyond Corporate, promotes  solicitor Angeliki Kotsidou to Associate, and the Group’s specialist family and children law practice, McAlister Family Law, promotes Associate Paul Reay to Senior Associate, and solicitors Jessica Horsman and Aaron Williams to Associate.

Angeliki is part of Beyond Corporate’s core corporate transactional team; Paul and Aaron are part of McAlister Family Law’s divorce and finance team, and Jess works within the children team.

Amanda McAlister, Managing Partner of McAlister Family Law, said: “These have been a challenging 12 months, particularly for those people involved in court hearings which have largely been held remotely and which have demanded a lot of family law solicitors. The pandemic has put a lot of strain on families and our workload has been increased significantly. We are absolutely delighted to recognise Paul, Aaron and Jess’ hard work and dedication with these promotions.”

Jim Truscott, who heads Beyond Corporate’s corporate law team, added: “Angeliki has worked extremely hard since qualification, demonstrating tremendous commitment to the corporate team and the wider Beyond Group, and we are extremely pleased to be able to see her progress with us as she moves to the next stage of her career, particularly as the Corporate Law team continues to grow as a result of increasing demand for its services.”

Beyond Group, established a little over three years ago, has gone from strength to strength, with its innovative business structure and outlook. The Group has created an inspiring working environment that is becoming increasingly attractive for client and service-focused teams and individuals who want to work in a positive, engaged and dynamic legal business.

Matt Fleetwood, who heads the Group, said: “We are delighted to be able to announce the promotions of Angeliki, Aaron, Paul and Jess. In what has been a challenging year in many ways, all our teams have worked extremely hard and continue to grow as they face increasing demand for their services.

“These promotions are very well deserved. We are proud to see each of them progress their careers with Beyond Group and we celebrate their commitment and success.”

McALISTER FAMILY LAW
MCALISTER HQ LOCATION:

Second Floor, Commercial Wharf

6 Commercial Street
Manchester, M15 4PZ

SOCIAL MEDIA:
HOW CAN WE HELP?
HOW CAN WE HELP?

If your enquiry is urgent please call

+44 (0)333 202 6433