Breach of child arrangements order – What are my options?

Posted on 4th May 2023 by McAlister Family Law

Breach of child arrangements order – What are my options?

Navigating decisions about arrangements for the children, house rules and holidays can be a very difficult task for separated parents. In cases where an impasse is irreconcilable, it may be necessary to secure a Child Arrangements Order to clarify matters and enable the parties to move on with their lives. Here, Agata Napora looks at the consequences if Court Orders aren’t followed.

Initial Steps

A constant breach can be very upsetting and cause a lot of uncertainty for the other parent and the child concerned which is far from desirable and should be handled with care. In first instance we would recommend that you always try to address all the issues direct as this may help break the ice between you and help resolve matters without the need of engaging a solicitor or taking your case back Court. However, should this approach be unsuccessful, the next step would be to contact a solicitor with a view to writing to the other party and reminding them of their obligation to comply with the Order and the legal ramifications if they continue to breach it.

A Child Arrangements Order has a “Warning Notice” attached to it which informs the parties about the consequences of failure to abide by the terms of the Order. From a legal standpoint, a breach of a Court Order is a serious affair as it constitutes a contempt of Court, and this may lead to sanctions being made against the non-compliant parent.

If correspondence from a solicitor does not achieve the desired effect and the other parent continues to act contrary to the terms of the Order, then you may need to consider applying to the Court for enforcement.

What Constitutes a Breach of an Order

When a Child Arrangements Order is already in place almost anything can amount to a breach including a lateness to the handover or a cancellation of contact due to an illness, or a prior work commitment. Whilst a one-off incident of this nature is unlikely to be enough for the Court to order a sanction against the other party, a series of minor breaches may have a profound impact on the welfare of the child and the Court will therefore take a closer look at the overall situation. It is therefore advisable to keep a record of all the instances and the frequency of the said breaches so that the Court can benefit from a full picture and is able to investigate the issues accordingly.

What the Court looks for in enforcement applications

The Court will determine the nature of the breach and look at the reasons behind the other parent’s non-compliance. The Judge will be interested in knowing as to whether there is a plausible explanation behind the other parent’s conduct or perhaps no valid justification at all. The Court will assess the effect of the breach on the child’s welfare and whether it would be in the child’s best interests for the order to be enforced. Every case is different, and in some circumstances, the Court may wish to obtain expert advice or a CAFCASS report or make a referral to social services to investigate matters in more detail before making a final determination.

How to make Enforcement application

An application to enforce a court order is made on a specific enforcement application form C79. There is also a Court fee payable of £232 unless you qualify for a fee remission. We would recommend that you seek legal advice on how to complete the form to ensure that your application is successful.

Enforcement and Sanctions

In deciding whether to enforce the Order, the Court must satisfy itself beyond reasonable doubt that such action is necessary and proportionate to the seriousness and frequency of the parent committing the breach and that the Enforcement Order is required to secure compliance with the Order. If the breach turns out to be minor or the parent in breach of the Order actively shows remorse and perhaps undertakes to the Court not to repeat the said misconduct, the Court is likely to consider that Enforcement Order is not necessary. Furthermore, if a parent in breach of the Order can show on balance of probabilities that they had a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the order, then it an Enforcement Order will not be granted.

Whilst some parties may be referred to a separated parents information program (SPIP) or mediation to resolve their disputes, others could be ordered to pay a fine, undertake unpaid work or be committed to prison. It may also be possible for one parent to seek a compensation for financial loss suffered by reason of the breach.

Who pays costs of enforcement proceedings

The standard rule on costs in children proceedings is that there should be no order for costs. This approach however does not apply to applications for enforcement orders meaning that the applicant party have the right to seek costs against the respondent party and the Court has a discretion to order the unsuccessful party to pay the reasonable legal costs of the other side.

If you are considering applying to the Court for enforcement of the existing Child Arrangements Order, we would highly recommend that you seek specialist assistance.

If you need advice on this topic, or any other matters concerning divorce or family law, please get in touch with our team at McAlister Family Law.

Maya Jama receives legal letter demanding £800,000 ring back

Posted on 26th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

Maya Jama receives legal letter demanding £800,000 ring back

Maya Jama receives legal letter demanding the return of £800,000 engagement ring to ex-fiancé Ben Simmons. Here, Lisa Brown looks at what happens to the ring if an engagement is called off.

The new Love Island host and basketball player ended their relationship last summer after Ben’s proposal to Maya over the Christmas period. This week, Maya reportedly received a letter demanding the return of Ben’s engagement ring, but if one half of an engaged couple calls off the wedding, what happens to the engagement ring?

Not every engagement leads to a wedding, and even for those who do get married, there may be a divorce down the line. As divorce lawyers, it’s not unusual for the soon-to-be-ex-couple to argue about who keeps the engagement ring, particularly if the ring was expensive.

One half of the couple will put forward the argument that they bought it, so they own it. The other half of the couple, naturally, will advance the argument that the ring was given to them as a gift, so they can claim rightful ownership.

What does the law say about engagement rings?

The Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 states:

“The gift of an engagement ring shall be presumed to be an absolute gift; this presumption may be rebutted by proving that the ring was given on the condition, express or implied, that it should be returned if the marriage did not take place for any reason.”

This means that unless there was an agreement to return the engagement ring if the wedding was cancelled, then the recipient is under no obligation to return the ring.

What if the engagement ring is a family heirloom?

If the engagement ring is a family heirloom, perhaps passed down through the family for many generations – and the recipient was made aware of this at the time – then it may be easier to succeed in an argument that the ring should be returned if the wedding is called off. However, no matter how sentimental the ring may be, if there has been no agreement made that the ring must be returned to the proposer, the Act still stands.

How do you ensure that you keep the ring if things don’t work out?

Many couples now enter into a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement. If the parties feel really strongly about it, provision for the fate of the engagement ring can be included in the agreement as a specific term should the couple divorce. Otherwise, the same general rule applies: the engagement ring is an absolute gift (and therefore not returnable) unless there was a condition made about the ring being returned when it was given.

So, if you are planning to ask your loved one to marry you this Valentine’s Day, maybe consider the future of the ring. We know that thoughts of break-ups and divorces should be the last thing on your mind, but if the ring has a lot of sentimental value, it might be worth protecting it in some way.

If you need advice on this topic, or any other matters concerning divorce or family law, please get in touch with our team at McAlister Family Law.

School admissions season – what happens if we disagree?

Posted on 19th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

School admissions season – What happens if we disagree?

January is never an easy month. It is one of the few times in the year where two 31-day months follow one after the other, spring feels like a lifetime away and pay day even further. On top of that, it’s school administration season. Here, Michael Compston looks at what happens if parents cannot agree on a school and how the choice can be made both inside and outside the court.

The local authority deadlines vary from authority to authority, but generally primary school deadlines are in place for the middle of January. Miss that deadline and your child runs the risk of not being accepted into their first-choice school and the application being considered as a late application.

Secondary school applications tend to run on a slightly different timetable, with deadlines being earlier in the academic year. However, we find that secondary school applications follow a more structured process as children/parents tend to be guided through this by the primary school during the child’s final year.

Children getting ready for primary school do not always have that information or guidance readily available, so this blog aims to consider how to resolve any issues arising out of primary school admissions.

Most if not all Local Authorities now process these applications online. The process is fairly straightforward; you go to the prospective schools, decide which ones you like or do not like, then select those schools in preferential order.

But what happens if you and the child’s other parent disagree? If you both have parental responsibility for a child, then it is incumbent on you both to come to a decision together. One of you may favour the school with strong academics or greater extra-curricular provision, whereas the other favours the school with more green space or a better pupil to teacher ratio. If you cannot agree on the preference order, how do you resolve matters?

Outside of court

The first solution is a simple one. Talk to each other. It might sound simple but actually discussing your preferences and why you think one school is better than the other can open up topics for discussion that you might not have considered.

If you are not able to reach a decision by discussing the matter between yourselves, then another option is to attend mediation. Mediators are trained to facilitate discussion between parents across a broad range of matters, not just limited to discussions around child contact. They can offer a neutral perspective and encourage back and forth discussion between the two of you.

Court proceedings

Should mediation not work, then the last recourse is to ask the court to make a decision by making a Specific Issue Order to decide that specific point. Alternatively, if the other parent is refusing to allow you access to the application and is preparing to submit the application themselves, it could be an application for a Prohibited Steps Order to prevent them submitting the application. Either way, both applications would be considering the same thing – what is in the best interests of the child.

This can be a costly exercise and a time-consuming exercise too. You are essentially asking the court to make a decision that, ultimately, is about what is best for the child. The court has not met your child, the court does not have the knowledge of the schools that the parents have, so you must think carefully before asking the court to intervene and make a decision that will have a long-lasting effect on your child’s education; if the child remains in their school, they will be in primary for seven years or secondary for five, so it is an important decision.

If you do end up in court proceedings, the court must consider what is in the child’s best interests. The court would almost certainly say initially that this is a decision that the parents should come to themselves; after all, the parents know the child better than the court. You would most likely both need to prepare witness statements on why you consider that your order of schools is the most suitable and then be prepared to argue your case in front of a judge.

Whilst this is very much a last resort, it is important to remember that this is the last recourse for the court. If you cannot agree, the court will likely want order you both to give evidence. It is far, far better if you can resolve matters between yourselves, with or without the help of a mediator, rather than reverting to the court process.

One Final Thought

Throughout all of these avenues for resolving any dispute on school choices, it is important to remember that the ultimate decision on where a child goes to school is down to the Local Authority in terms of state schools. The order of preferences is still important, as it will help to inform the decision of the Local Authority, but the decision is ultimately one for them.

If you need advice on this topic, or any other matters concerning divorce or family law, please get in touch with our team at McAlister Family Law.

Noel Gallagher and Sara MacDonald to divorce after 22 years – Does the length of marriage matter?

Posted on 16th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

Noel Gallagher and Sara MacDonald to divorce after 22 years – Does the length of marriage matter?

Noel Gallagher, Manchester born former Oasis member, and his wife, Sara MacDonald have announced that they are to divorce following a marriage of 22 years. Here Weronika Husejko looks at how the length of a marriage can impact divorce proceedings.

The former couple married in 2011, having begun their relationship in 2001. They have two children together, Donovan, aged 15 and Sonny aged 12, both of whom are still dependent.

It is a commonly queried whether the length of a marriage has any relevance within a divorce financial settlement. The short answer to this question would be yes.

When a Judge considers a financial settlement, they must consider section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. Section 25, amongst other things, specifies that a Judge must in particular have regard to the duration of the couples’ marriage.

What does this mean in practice?

Generally speaking, a marriage usually falls into one of three brackets, that being either a short term, medium term or long term marriage.

A short term marriage would usually be considered to be one of up to 5 years. It should be noted however that a couple cannot divorce until they have been married for a minimum of 1 year. It is more likely that the financial settlement in a short term marriage will take into consideration pre acquired assets. A “clean break” may be considered to be more appropriate in these circumstances. However, this may not always be the case, especially if there are dependent children involved, in which case the focus would be on ensuring that the children’s needs are met.

A medium term marriage would generally be viewed as around 10 years.

Noel and Sara’s marriage would most likely be considered to be a long marriage on the basis that they began living together around 2001, their marriage being a total of 22 years. This is because a period of cohabitation that moves seamlessly into marriage will also be taken into account by the Courts, when considering the length of the marriage.

A longer marriage of this nature can often be more complex when it comes to the financial settlement. The Courts may take a different approach when dividing matrimonial assets in this type of case, compared to that of a short or medium term marriage. By way of example, it is far less likely for the Court to consider Noel and Sara’s respective contributions to the marriage. As a result, it may be that there will be an equal division of assets, unless it is necessary to move away from a 50-50 split to meet the need of one of the spouses.

It may be that Noel and Sara have a pre nuptial agreement, in which case this may be taken into consideration by the Courts, and therefore may have an impact upon the overall financial settlement.

In any event, the Court’s primary interest in their case will be in ensuring that the needs of both Donovan and Sonny are met.

If you need advice on this topic, or any other matters concerning divorce issues, please get in touch with our private child team at McAlister Family Law.

We cannot agree on counselling for our child – What will the court decide?

Posted on 12th January 202312th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

We cannot agree on counselling for our child – What will the court decide?

According to statistics, nearly one in 10 children and young people are affected by a mental health problem. The good news is that there is now more awareness of this issue and a number of resources available to children and young people who may be suffering. Here, Melissa Jones looks at what the court can decide if parents cannot agree on counselling for their child?

Understandably, separation and divorce can be a difficult and anxious time for children. They might feel confused and believe they need to “pick sides”. They might also believe that the separation of their parents is “their fault” and might be feeling guilty.

Where does this leave you?

Decisions on a child attending counselling would fall under the umbrella of medical decisions. If you both agree, then great, they would attend counselling. If only one parent agrees, this does not necessarily mean that the counselling should go ahead and with such important decisions is not advisable to act unilaterally. This issue should be agreed upon by all of those with parental responsibility for the child(ren).

What is Parental Responsibility?

Under section 3 (1) of the Children Act 1989 “parental responsibility” means all the rights, duties, powers, responsibilities and authority which by law a parent of a child has in relation to the child and his property.

What application do I need to make?

In the absence consent from all those who hold parental responsibility, a parent may wish to apply to the court for a Specific Issue Order, for the court’s permission to enable them to make decisions about the child in the absence of the other parent’s consent.

The application that would need to be made comes under Section 8 of the Children Act 1989 and is for a specific issue application; to specifically address what is the best interests of the children’s education and medical matters. Within the proceedings evidence shall be put forward by both parents to set out how their proposal is in the children’s best interests.

However, prior to making an application, the court would encourage the parties to engage in Alternative Dispute Resolution, to see if matters can be resolved. It may be that if you have spoken to a medical professional or a GP who highly recommends that the child or children attend counselling then you may be better assisted in your discussions with the other parent or in any application to the court.

Most importantly it would be best to understand why the other parent objects to the child(ren) attending counselling. Perhaps they need more information first or would like to speak to the counsellor themselves either on their own or jointly with you.

What will the court decide?

If matters relating to a child’s medical care are put before the Court, the matter then becomes a question of what is best for the child and not what is best for the parents. The Court’s primary consideration will be the needs of the child and will have regard to the Welfare Checklist (s.1 (3) CA 1989) when reaching their decisions. Arguably attending Counselling for the child might be in the child’s best interest and a vital resource to help them deal with their mental health issues. Conversely, it might not be necessary for the child to attend counselling and it may be considered intrusive and invasive given their age, characteristics and understanding. It is of course a balancing act.

Can I not just take them to counselling anyway?

However, if one parent has taken matters in their own hands and begins the process of making medical decisions without the other parents’ consent, that would not be perceived well by the court. In fact, if you choose to ignore the other parent’s views or objections, then they in turn could make an application to the family court to prevent you from making the child(ren) available for counselling. This also comes under Section 8 of the Children Act 1989 and would be for a prohibited steps order; to prohibit the child(ren) from attending counselling.

In all cases and at all times parents are strongly encouraged not just to communicate their wishes, but to co parent effectively for the best interests of their children.

If you need advice on this topic, or any other matters concerning children issues, please get in touch with our private child team at McAlister Family Law.

Resource: https://www.counselling-directory.org.uk/young-people-stats.html#riskfactors

Media and the family court – Do the public need to know what’s happening?

Posted on 5th December 2022 by McAlister Family Law

Media and the family court – Do the public need to know what’s happening?

For the first time, under a twelve-month pilot scheme running from January 2023 – January 2024, journalists may be able to report on what happens in family courts in 3 selected areas of the UK Cardiff, Leeds and Carlisle. In his latest blog post, Jack Tonge looks at the law now and what the pilot scheme may offer.

Current UK law forbids anything that happens in a family court from being reported unless a judge explicitly makes an order allowing it.

The rationale for keeping family court hearings behind closed doors is so that children’s rights to privacy are protected.

Under the pilot scheme journalists may report on what they witness within the family court arena, subject to ‘the principles of protection of the anonymity of any children involved unless the Judge orders otherwise’. Families can also be interviewed in respect of their cases so long as their anonymity is protected.

Under the pilot scheme journalists may be able to name local authorities, the lawyers involved, as well as experts appointed by the Court. However, unless ordered by the court, individual social workers will remain anonymous as with the identities of medical professionals treating children or any family member within the case.

It is important to note that the Articles of the ECHR still play an important part in governing the Court’s discretion. The Court is still under a duty to ensure the rights of the family and parties remain intact such has having a right to a fair trial (Article 6), whilst balancing the rights to a private and family life (Article 8) and the rights of the press, public and parties (Article 10). Therefore, the Court may depart from the transparency principle should the case deem it necessary.

Whilst it remains to be seen whether the pilot will bring an end to the often criticised ‘secrecy’ of the family court arena; it is clear that the Transparency Reporting Pilot is the start of implementing changes to impact the same.

If you are affected by any of the issues raised here, please get in touch today. We are here to help.

The cost-of-living crisis and its impact on financial remedy proceedings

Posted on 20th October 202224th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

The cost-of-living crisis and its impact on financial remedy proceedings

One of the most discussed topics over the last few months has been the anticipated increase to the cost of living in the UK. The Office for National Statistics state that 9 in 10 adults in Britain have reported an increase in their cost of living. Here, Weronika Husejko takes a closer look at the impact of the cost-of-living crisis and how it will impact financial remedy proceedings.

What impact will this have?

Whilst the Government have recently announced measures to help tackle the crisis, including tax cuts and a £400 energy discount, there are other factors such as inflation which will inevitably increase all of our expenditure going forward.

The cost-of-living crisis is expected to see individuals fall into more debt than usual, experiencing difficulties meeting their standard outgoings and ability to afford other activities such as holidays.

This will be ever more relevant for those going through the process of separation, in particular those with a mid to low income. They will be amongst those most impacted by the significant increase in expenditure, one of the reasons being that it can be very difficult to adjust from a household with two incomes to that of one. Outgoings naturally increase upon separation as there are two households to upkeep as opposed to one.

Will this be taken into consideration within financial remedy proceedings?

When financial remedy proceedings are issued, the Court will direct that both parties are to complete a Form E of their financial disclosure. Within that form, there is a section relating to the income needs of yourself and your children.

Your income needs are your general expenditure, whether that be on an annual, monthly or weekly basis. This involves detailing a list of your regular outgoings such as rent, utility bills, food and clothing. This is an important part of financial remedy proceedings as it allows the Court to see what your outgoings are and how much you need to meet them. They can then compare it to how much income you have.

You are given the opportunity to state not only your ‘current’ income needs, but also your ‘future expected’ income needs. This is because the Court consider both current and future needs. Therefore, in circumstances where you expect your income needs to change, whether that be higher or lower, you can make this clear to the Court within your Form E.

The Form E also includes a ‘liabilities’ section which allows you to disclose any debts you have. Generally, ‘hard’ loans e.g. bank loans or credit cards will be taken into account by the Court, even if they have been incurred post-separation. As a result, if your debts increase due to the current economic circumstances, this may be relevant within financial proceedings.

It follows that if you have been or are going to be impacted by the cost-of-living increase, this may be taken into consideration by the Court within financial remedy proceedings.

The legitimacy of Court-Appointed ‘Experts’ in parental alienation cases

Posted on 18th October 202224th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

The legitimacy of Court-Appointed ‘Experts’ in parental alienation cases

Ruth Hetherington, Partner and Head of the Private Children Team at McAlister Family Law, and a Specialist in Children matters welcomes the announcement that the President of the Family Courts, Sir Andrew McFarlane will be overseeing an Appeal later this month in which issues of parental alienation and the use of experts will hopefully be reviewed.

What is parental alienation?

Parental alienation has been a hot topic for many years now. There is no legal definition of parental alienation, but the concept has evolved through cases that are heard in the Family Courts. Cafcass, the independent body appointed by the Court, defines parental alienation as ‘when a child’s resistance/hostility towards one parent is not justified and is the result of psychological manipulation by one parent’.

In my experience sadly, it is becoming a very common feature in cases where parents have separated and one parent, whether directly or indirectly, displays to a child or children unjustified negativity aimed at the other parent.

What are the repercussions of parental alienation?

In such cases the relationship between parent and child can be lost altogether and the courts have been struggling to deal with such cases as quite often the alienation can be subtle, difficult to identify and can take place over several months if not years.

I have acted for both parents and children in these types of situations and I have seen first-hand the harm that children suffer as a result, which can be long term and affect children in developing healthy relationships themselves.

From my point of view trying to establish that parental alienation exists is a difficult task and as such the Courts have allowed Experts (generally Psychologists) to be appointed to assist in evaluating negative behaviours.

The use of Experts in cases of suspected parental alienation.

In the case that is to be overseen by the President of the Family Courts, Sir Andrew McFarlane, later this month, the qualifications of the Expert who was appointed, will be under scrutiny. The Expert believed parental alienation had taken place, but there is concern from the Court that this Expert may not have been appropriately qualified and was not regulated by any professional body.

In my opinion the regulation of court appointed Experts is something that needs to be addressed urgently. Therefore, the announcement of this Appeal is very much welcomed, and I sincerely hope that the concept of “parental alienation” is also addressed. Although professionals who deal with matters such as these have their own working hypothesis, there needs to be clear guidance given to both professionals, parents and anyone who cares for children about how the Court will deal with cases where a parent/carer of children behaviour is not what it should be.

What needs to change?

Parental alienation can have detrimental effects on a child’s mental health and wellbeing, right into adulthood. It is my view that parents/carers need to have their children at the forefront of their minds in everything that they say and do, to protect them from what will be a sad and upsetting experience of their parents separating. It is sometimes hard for parents to hide their own feelings and as a result they lose sight of the fact that their children will pick up on their parent’s behaviours.

In my opinion children often get outlooked when ‘battle lines’ are drawn between the parents, and it is for these reasons that the Court will be assisted by an Expert. The Court’s paramount consideration is always the welfare of the children, and it is therefore understandable that the need for the Court to be guided by Experts is sometimes required.

Final thoughts

It is my hope that as awareness is raised around the detrimental impact parental alienation can have on the whole family, particularly on the children, we will get to a point where the use of Experts will be evaluated and scrutinised to ensure that the Expert is right for that particular family, appropriately qualified and only used where absolutely necessary.

It is crucial for any parent who has concerns over child arrangements, or feels they are victim to parental alienation, to instruct a lawyer who is highly specialised in children matters. This will ensure that that all matters can be addressed and will ensure that the child’s welfare is at the heart of any decision that a parent may take, which will ultimately inform the Court’s overall final decision for the arrangements of any child.

How would Stallone’s alleged misconduct sit with the Courts of England and Wales?

Posted on 1st September 202224th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

How would Stallone’s alleged misconduct sit with the Courts of England and Wales?

Sylvester Stallone hit the headlines once again recently, after news broke that his wife of some 25 years, Jennifer Flavin, had filed for divorce. In his latest blog post, George Wilson takes a closer look at how Stallone’s alleged misconduct would sit with the Courts of England and Wales.

The divorce suit was filed just days before a video emerged of Stallone, now 76 years old, covering up a tattoo of Flavin on his bicep with a picture of Butkus, the bull mastiff from the Rocky film franchise. Although Stallone was not shy about disclosing the video to the world at large, it has been alleged by Flavin that he hasn’t quite disclosed things he should have and has hidden marital assets within the divorce proceedings. Flavin’s legal team further state that the Stallone has:

“engaged in the intentional dissipation, depletion and/or waste of marital assets which has had an adverse economic impact on the marital estate”

Naturally, Stallone’s solicitors have denied any sort of misconduct.

How would Stallone’s alleged misconduct sit with the Courts of England and Wales?

In the jurisdiction of England and Wales, all parties to financial remedy proceedings within divorce owe a duty of full and frank financial disclosure to the Court and, in turn, their spouse. Essentially, parties within the proceedings must disclose all of the available information about their assets and income, by way of detailed financial disclosure, usually on the standard document used for such disclosure, Form E. Such disclosure will include evidence of the value of properties parties have an interest in, copies of bank statements linked to bank accounts in their name, evidence of their income and income needs, evidence of other assets such as investments and ISAs, valuable chattels such as artwork, jewellery, and watches, and motor vehicles.

Parties will also need to provide evidence of dividend counterfoils, company accounts, tax returns, and any liabilities they might have against their name. This list is by no means exhaustive, and parties are often shocked at how much detail they are required to provide within their financial disclosure. A blank Form E can be found at this link for ease of reference.

If parties to a divorce refuse, or fail to provide the required disclosure, the consequences (and remedies available to the Court and their spouse) are very serious. The court is likely to draw “adverse inferences” about parties who fail to provide the required disclosure. Essentially, this means that the Court can, and will, assume a spouse has something to hide and can make robust assumptions about the trust value of their assets and level of their income. Furthermore, if the divorce (and financial remedy proceedings) has concluded and one spouse believes that their ex-spouse had hidden assets, it may be possible to reopen the case. The court can reopen any case if it finds there has been deliberate and fraudulent non-disclosure of assets by one spouse.

Such assets, now visible and disclosed, will come under scrutiny, and the court can decide as to how the same should be divided. Perhaps the worst outcome of being found ‘guilty’ of non-disclosure, is the Court finding that a spouse has been in contempt of court and if the contempt has been deliberate, then the guilty spouse can be fined or even have a custodial sentence forced upon them. It is therefore of paramount important to work with a solicitor to ensure that the disclosure you provide is full and frank.

Stallone has also been accused of dissipating marital assets. Dissipation of assets occurs when one spouse has used, given away or otherwise transferred, converted, wasted, mismanaged, or adversely affected assets that would have been subject to division and distribution. Dissipation of assets may be in the form of the quick sale of assets such as property, stocks and shares, or other chattels such as artwork. Dissipation can also be more subtle and can be in the form of significant ‘gifts’ to friends and family, substantial cash withdrawals, gambling, or other unusual and possible reckless purchases. The court will see such dissipation of assets as an act of litigation misconduct.

Under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, it is possible for one spouse to apply to freeze certain assets belonging to the other, to reduce the risk that they are dissipated. In such circumstances, it is essential to act quickly, with the assistance of solicitor, should you suspect that your spouse intends to dissipate assets, as it is much more difficult to deal with the assets once they have been dissipated.

We cannot agree on a school – What will the court decide?

Posted on 15th July 202224th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

We cannot agree on a school – What will the court decide?

If you are separated parents and cannot agree on what school your children should attend there are considerations that both of you need to keep in mind. Here, Jemma Wentworth discusses what happens when a separated couple cannot decide on which school their child should attend, and how the Court’s decision may vary depending on the care arrangement.

If it is agreed between you that one parent is the primary carer, meaning that one parent deals with the day to day needs of the children, and the children’s home is with that particular parent, then common sense must prevail. The school most local to that parent, or the school being selected by that parent, should be first consideration.

If that educational setting is not agreed by the non-primary parent, justifiable reasons must be put forward setting out why another setting should be considered. This is a scenario when obtaining legal advice would be beneficial.

However, if there is a shared care arrangement in place, thereby resulting that both parents’ homes are where the children equally call their home, and if the parents cannot agree on an educational setting, obtaining legal advice is vital and an application to the family court may well be required.

Initially, other forums for alternative dispute resolution to resolve the dispute must be attempted, for example, mediation. If an agreement cannot be reached, a court application should be issued.

The application that would need to be made comes under section 8 of the Children Act 1989 and is for a specific issue application; to specifically address what is the best interests of the children’s education. Within the proceedings evidence shall be put forward by both parents to set out how their proposal is in the children’s best interests.

However, if one parent has taken matters in their own hands and begins the process of changing the children’s school without the other parents’ consent, that parent would need to issue an urgent application to the family court to prevent the children’s removal from that school. This also comes under section 8 of the Children Act 1989 and would be for a prohibited steps order; to prohibit the children’s removal from the school without a court order to do so. In this case, any order of the court would need to be provided to the school as well as all those with parental responsibility.

In all cases and at all times parents are strongly encouraged not just to communicate their wishes, but to co parent effectively for the best interests of their children.

If you need advice on this topic, or any other matters concerning children issues, please get in touch with our private child team at McAlister Family Law.