Transparency in the Family Courts – the Dawn of a ‘New Norm’

Posted on 1st June 2023 by McAlister Family Law

Transparency in the Family Courts – the Dawn of a ‘New Norm’

Should the media report on the Family Courts? Here, Ruth Hetherington looks at the role of transparency in the family courts and how transparency orders will protect those families already under a lot of stress.

For many years now, on the whole, the Family Courts sit in private, which means no one else is allowed into the Court hearing except those people involved. Some would say that there is a shroud of secrecy in the Family Courts and decisions are being made behind closed doors. There has been a genuine reason for this … there is a need to protect the privacy of the people involved, particularly children balanced with having the public’s perception, trust and confidence about the way in which the family courts operate.

At present S.12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960 prevents reporting of most family law cases in the absence of the Judges consent. This legislation was intended to ‘protect and support the administration of justice’.

S.97 Children Act 1989 protects the identity of children. It is a criminal offence if breached.

As it can be seen, currently there is little scope for reporting on any family case.

It would be fair to say that most family cases have been held in private, but the public only get to hear about ‘big money’ cases and predominantly the lives of celebrities when they hit the headlines.

The appetite however for the family courts to be more accessible has been a matter of discussion and debate for many years. The President of the Family Law Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane intends to change all of that.

Sir Andrew McFarlane published a report in October 2021 entitled ‘Confidence and Confidentiality: Transparency in the Family Courts’.

The emphasis now is very much that the veil of secrecy and mystery associated with the family courts needs to be lifted, mainly to provide the public with confidence that the family courts are safeguarding children and their families.

Sir Andrew McFarlane says ‘the time has come for accredited media representatives to be able to not only attend hearings but to report publicly on what they see and hear. Any reporting must however be subject to very clear rules to maintain anonymity of children and families and to keep confidential intimate details of their private lives.

Pilots are now running in Cardiff, Leeds and Carlisle, and they will continue throughout 2023 with data being collated. In essence accredited media representatives and legal bloggers are permitted to attend court hearings, have access to documents and report on the outcome, subject to the terms of a Transparency Order.

Transparency orders will set out what can and cannot be reported on. Reporters must and will be bound by that order. The Transparency Order can be varied or removed at any point, by the Court.

The case needs to be conducted in an orderly way and not be prejudiced or compromised. However, how this operates in practice forms part of the Pilot now running.

The pilot will start with public law cases (care proceedings) then private law children proceedings.

The jury is still out, as many family practitioners, are apprehensive of the changes as all families going through the family court are already experiencing stress and anxiety without having to deal with an added layer that their case could be reported on. It may prevent or deter many vulnerable people in seeking access to justice at a time in their lives where help and support is needed.

The message is clear, confidence and confidentiality can be achieved and that there needs to be a major shift in culture.

Legal bloggers

Interesting concept and development within the Pilot in that anyone can ‘blog’ on the law, but can they just attend a hearing? The answer is no. To be able to attend court hearings you must be a ‘duly authorised lawyer’. Blogging can only be for journalistic research or public, legal educational purposes. So…in the busy lives of family practitioners do they have time to attend other court hearings that they are not involved in, would they want to, could this be part of training for young lawyers entering the early part of their career. It remans to be some as to whether there is the ‘up take’ on legal bloggers.

If you need advice on this topic, or any other matters concerning divorce or family law, please get in touch with our team at McAlister Family Law.

Maya Jama receives legal letter demanding £800,000 ring back

Posted on 26th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

Maya Jama receives legal letter demanding £800,000 ring back

Maya Jama receives legal letter demanding the return of £800,000 engagement ring to ex-fiancé Ben Simmons. Here, Lisa Brown looks at what happens to the ring if an engagement is called off.

The new Love Island host and basketball player ended their relationship last summer after Ben’s proposal to Maya over the Christmas period. This week, Maya reportedly received a letter demanding the return of Ben’s engagement ring, but if one half of an engaged couple calls off the wedding, what happens to the engagement ring?

Not every engagement leads to a wedding, and even for those who do get married, there may be a divorce down the line. As divorce lawyers, it’s not unusual for the soon-to-be-ex-couple to argue about who keeps the engagement ring, particularly if the ring was expensive.

One half of the couple will put forward the argument that they bought it, so they own it. The other half of the couple, naturally, will advance the argument that the ring was given to them as a gift, so they can claim rightful ownership.

What does the law say about engagement rings?

The Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 states:

“The gift of an engagement ring shall be presumed to be an absolute gift; this presumption may be rebutted by proving that the ring was given on the condition, express or implied, that it should be returned if the marriage did not take place for any reason.”

This means that unless there was an agreement to return the engagement ring if the wedding was cancelled, then the recipient is under no obligation to return the ring.

What if the engagement ring is a family heirloom?

If the engagement ring is a family heirloom, perhaps passed down through the family for many generations – and the recipient was made aware of this at the time – then it may be easier to succeed in an argument that the ring should be returned if the wedding is called off. However, no matter how sentimental the ring may be, if there has been no agreement made that the ring must be returned to the proposer, the Act still stands.

How do you ensure that you keep the ring if things don’t work out?

Many couples now enter into a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement. If the parties feel really strongly about it, provision for the fate of the engagement ring can be included in the agreement as a specific term should the couple divorce. Otherwise, the same general rule applies: the engagement ring is an absolute gift (and therefore not returnable) unless there was a condition made about the ring being returned when it was given.

So, if you are planning to ask your loved one to marry you this Valentine’s Day, maybe consider the future of the ring. We know that thoughts of break-ups and divorces should be the last thing on your mind, but if the ring has a lot of sentimental value, it might be worth protecting it in some way.

If you need advice on this topic, or any other matters concerning divorce or family law, please get in touch with our team at McAlister Family Law.

School admissions season – what happens if we disagree?

Posted on 19th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

School admissions season – What happens if we disagree?

January is never an easy month. It is one of the few times in the year where two 31-day months follow one after the other, spring feels like a lifetime away and pay day even further. On top of that, it’s school administration season. Here, Michael Compston looks at what happens if parents cannot agree on a school and how the choice can be made both inside and outside the court.

The local authority deadlines vary from authority to authority, but generally primary school deadlines are in place for the middle of January. Miss that deadline and your child runs the risk of not being accepted into their first-choice school and the application being considered as a late application.

Secondary school applications tend to run on a slightly different timetable, with deadlines being earlier in the academic year. However, we find that secondary school applications follow a more structured process as children/parents tend to be guided through this by the primary school during the child’s final year.

Children getting ready for primary school do not always have that information or guidance readily available, so this blog aims to consider how to resolve any issues arising out of primary school admissions.

Most if not all Local Authorities now process these applications online. The process is fairly straightforward; you go to the prospective schools, decide which ones you like or do not like, then select those schools in preferential order.

But what happens if you and the child’s other parent disagree? If you both have parental responsibility for a child, then it is incumbent on you both to come to a decision together. One of you may favour the school with strong academics or greater extra-curricular provision, whereas the other favours the school with more green space or a better pupil to teacher ratio. If you cannot agree on the preference order, how do you resolve matters?

Outside of court

The first solution is a simple one. Talk to each other. It might sound simple but actually discussing your preferences and why you think one school is better than the other can open up topics for discussion that you might not have considered.

If you are not able to reach a decision by discussing the matter between yourselves, then another option is to attend mediation. Mediators are trained to facilitate discussion between parents across a broad range of matters, not just limited to discussions around child contact. They can offer a neutral perspective and encourage back and forth discussion between the two of you.

Court proceedings

Should mediation not work, then the last recourse is to ask the court to make a decision by making a Specific Issue Order to decide that specific point. Alternatively, if the other parent is refusing to allow you access to the application and is preparing to submit the application themselves, it could be an application for a Prohibited Steps Order to prevent them submitting the application. Either way, both applications would be considering the same thing – what is in the best interests of the child.

This can be a costly exercise and a time-consuming exercise too. You are essentially asking the court to make a decision that, ultimately, is about what is best for the child. The court has not met your child, the court does not have the knowledge of the schools that the parents have, so you must think carefully before asking the court to intervene and make a decision that will have a long-lasting effect on your child’s education; if the child remains in their school, they will be in primary for seven years or secondary for five, so it is an important decision.

If you do end up in court proceedings, the court must consider what is in the child’s best interests. The court would almost certainly say initially that this is a decision that the parents should come to themselves; after all, the parents know the child better than the court. You would most likely both need to prepare witness statements on why you consider that your order of schools is the most suitable and then be prepared to argue your case in front of a judge.

Whilst this is very much a last resort, it is important to remember that this is the last recourse for the court. If you cannot agree, the court will likely want order you both to give evidence. It is far, far better if you can resolve matters between yourselves, with or without the help of a mediator, rather than reverting to the court process.

One Final Thought

Throughout all of these avenues for resolving any dispute on school choices, it is important to remember that the ultimate decision on where a child goes to school is down to the Local Authority in terms of state schools. The order of preferences is still important, as it will help to inform the decision of the Local Authority, but the decision is ultimately one for them.

If you need advice on this topic, or any other matters concerning divorce or family law, please get in touch with our team at McAlister Family Law.

Media and the family court – Do the public need to know what’s happening?

Posted on 5th December 2022 by McAlister Family Law

Media and the family court – Do the public need to know what’s happening?

For the first time, under a twelve-month pilot scheme running from January 2023 – January 2024, journalists may be able to report on what happens in family courts in 3 selected areas of the UK Cardiff, Leeds and Carlisle. In his latest blog post, Jack Tonge looks at the law now and what the pilot scheme may offer.

Current UK law forbids anything that happens in a family court from being reported unless a judge explicitly makes an order allowing it.

The rationale for keeping family court hearings behind closed doors is so that children’s rights to privacy are protected.

Under the pilot scheme journalists may report on what they witness within the family court arena, subject to ‘the principles of protection of the anonymity of any children involved unless the Judge orders otherwise’. Families can also be interviewed in respect of their cases so long as their anonymity is protected.

Under the pilot scheme journalists may be able to name local authorities, the lawyers involved, as well as experts appointed by the Court. However, unless ordered by the court, individual social workers will remain anonymous as with the identities of medical professionals treating children or any family member within the case.

It is important to note that the Articles of the ECHR still play an important part in governing the Court’s discretion. The Court is still under a duty to ensure the rights of the family and parties remain intact such has having a right to a fair trial (Article 6), whilst balancing the rights to a private and family life (Article 8) and the rights of the press, public and parties (Article 10). Therefore, the Court may depart from the transparency principle should the case deem it necessary.

Whilst it remains to be seen whether the pilot will bring an end to the often criticised ‘secrecy’ of the family court arena; it is clear that the Transparency Reporting Pilot is the start of implementing changes to impact the same.

If you are affected by any of the issues raised here, please get in touch today. We are here to help.

The cost-of-living crisis and its impact on financial remedy proceedings

Posted on 20th October 202224th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

The cost-of-living crisis and its impact on financial remedy proceedings

One of the most discussed topics over the last few months has been the anticipated increase to the cost of living in the UK. The Office for National Statistics state that 9 in 10 adults in Britain have reported an increase in their cost of living. Here, Weronika Husejko takes a closer look at the impact of the cost-of-living crisis and how it will impact financial remedy proceedings.

What impact will this have?

Whilst the Government have recently announced measures to help tackle the crisis, including tax cuts and a £400 energy discount, there are other factors such as inflation which will inevitably increase all of our expenditure going forward.

The cost-of-living crisis is expected to see individuals fall into more debt than usual, experiencing difficulties meeting their standard outgoings and ability to afford other activities such as holidays.

This will be ever more relevant for those going through the process of separation, in particular those with a mid to low income. They will be amongst those most impacted by the significant increase in expenditure, one of the reasons being that it can be very difficult to adjust from a household with two incomes to that of one. Outgoings naturally increase upon separation as there are two households to upkeep as opposed to one.

Will this be taken into consideration within financial remedy proceedings?

When financial remedy proceedings are issued, the Court will direct that both parties are to complete a Form E of their financial disclosure. Within that form, there is a section relating to the income needs of yourself and your children.

Your income needs are your general expenditure, whether that be on an annual, monthly or weekly basis. This involves detailing a list of your regular outgoings such as rent, utility bills, food and clothing. This is an important part of financial remedy proceedings as it allows the Court to see what your outgoings are and how much you need to meet them. They can then compare it to how much income you have.

You are given the opportunity to state not only your ‘current’ income needs, but also your ‘future expected’ income needs. This is because the Court consider both current and future needs. Therefore, in circumstances where you expect your income needs to change, whether that be higher or lower, you can make this clear to the Court within your Form E.

The Form E also includes a ‘liabilities’ section which allows you to disclose any debts you have. Generally, ‘hard’ loans e.g. bank loans or credit cards will be taken into account by the Court, even if they have been incurred post-separation. As a result, if your debts increase due to the current economic circumstances, this may be relevant within financial proceedings.

It follows that if you have been or are going to be impacted by the cost-of-living increase, this may be taken into consideration by the Court within financial remedy proceedings.

The legitimacy of Court-Appointed ‘Experts’ in parental alienation cases

Posted on 18th October 202224th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

The legitimacy of Court-Appointed ‘Experts’ in parental alienation cases

Ruth Hetherington, Partner and Head of the Private Children Team at McAlister Family Law, and a Specialist in Children matters welcomes the announcement that the President of the Family Courts, Sir Andrew McFarlane will be overseeing an Appeal later this month in which issues of parental alienation and the use of experts will hopefully be reviewed.

What is parental alienation?

Parental alienation has been a hot topic for many years now. There is no legal definition of parental alienation, but the concept has evolved through cases that are heard in the Family Courts. Cafcass, the independent body appointed by the Court, defines parental alienation as ‘when a child’s resistance/hostility towards one parent is not justified and is the result of psychological manipulation by one parent’.

In my experience sadly, it is becoming a very common feature in cases where parents have separated and one parent, whether directly or indirectly, displays to a child or children unjustified negativity aimed at the other parent.

What are the repercussions of parental alienation?

In such cases the relationship between parent and child can be lost altogether and the courts have been struggling to deal with such cases as quite often the alienation can be subtle, difficult to identify and can take place over several months if not years.

I have acted for both parents and children in these types of situations and I have seen first-hand the harm that children suffer as a result, which can be long term and affect children in developing healthy relationships themselves.

From my point of view trying to establish that parental alienation exists is a difficult task and as such the Courts have allowed Experts (generally Psychologists) to be appointed to assist in evaluating negative behaviours.

The use of Experts in cases of suspected parental alienation.

In the case that is to be overseen by the President of the Family Courts, Sir Andrew McFarlane, later this month, the qualifications of the Expert who was appointed, will be under scrutiny. The Expert believed parental alienation had taken place, but there is concern from the Court that this Expert may not have been appropriately qualified and was not regulated by any professional body.

In my opinion the regulation of court appointed Experts is something that needs to be addressed urgently. Therefore, the announcement of this Appeal is very much welcomed, and I sincerely hope that the concept of “parental alienation” is also addressed. Although professionals who deal with matters such as these have their own working hypothesis, there needs to be clear guidance given to both professionals, parents and anyone who cares for children about how the Court will deal with cases where a parent/carer of children behaviour is not what it should be.

What needs to change?

Parental alienation can have detrimental effects on a child’s mental health and wellbeing, right into adulthood. It is my view that parents/carers need to have their children at the forefront of their minds in everything that they say and do, to protect them from what will be a sad and upsetting experience of their parents separating. It is sometimes hard for parents to hide their own feelings and as a result they lose sight of the fact that their children will pick up on their parent’s behaviours.

In my opinion children often get outlooked when ‘battle lines’ are drawn between the parents, and it is for these reasons that the Court will be assisted by an Expert. The Court’s paramount consideration is always the welfare of the children, and it is therefore understandable that the need for the Court to be guided by Experts is sometimes required.

Final thoughts

It is my hope that as awareness is raised around the detrimental impact parental alienation can have on the whole family, particularly on the children, we will get to a point where the use of Experts will be evaluated and scrutinised to ensure that the Expert is right for that particular family, appropriately qualified and only used where absolutely necessary.

It is crucial for any parent who has concerns over child arrangements, or feels they are victim to parental alienation, to instruct a lawyer who is highly specialised in children matters. This will ensure that that all matters can be addressed and will ensure that the child’s welfare is at the heart of any decision that a parent may take, which will ultimately inform the Court’s overall final decision for the arrangements of any child.

We cannot agree on a school – What will the court decide?

Posted on 15th July 202224th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

We cannot agree on a school – What will the court decide?

If you are separated parents and cannot agree on what school your children should attend there are considerations that both of you need to keep in mind. Here, Jemma Wentworth discusses what happens when a separated couple cannot decide on which school their child should attend, and how the Court’s decision may vary depending on the care arrangement.

If it is agreed between you that one parent is the primary carer, meaning that one parent deals with the day to day needs of the children, and the children’s home is with that particular parent, then common sense must prevail. The school most local to that parent, or the school being selected by that parent, should be first consideration.

If that educational setting is not agreed by the non-primary parent, justifiable reasons must be put forward setting out why another setting should be considered. This is a scenario when obtaining legal advice would be beneficial.

However, if there is a shared care arrangement in place, thereby resulting that both parents’ homes are where the children equally call their home, and if the parents cannot agree on an educational setting, obtaining legal advice is vital and an application to the family court may well be required.

Initially, other forums for alternative dispute resolution to resolve the dispute must be attempted, for example, mediation. If an agreement cannot be reached, a court application should be issued.

The application that would need to be made comes under section 8 of the Children Act 1989 and is for a specific issue application; to specifically address what is the best interests of the children’s education. Within the proceedings evidence shall be put forward by both parents to set out how their proposal is in the children’s best interests.

However, if one parent has taken matters in their own hands and begins the process of changing the children’s school without the other parents’ consent, that parent would need to issue an urgent application to the family court to prevent the children’s removal from that school. This also comes under section 8 of the Children Act 1989 and would be for a prohibited steps order; to prohibit the children’s removal from the school without a court order to do so. In this case, any order of the court would need to be provided to the school as well as all those with parental responsibility.

In all cases and at all times parents are strongly encouraged not just to communicate their wishes, but to co parent effectively for the best interests of their children.

If you need advice on this topic, or any other matters concerning children issues, please get in touch with our private child team at McAlister Family Law.

Divorce and school fees – Will the court make my spouse pay?

Posted on 6th July 202224th January 2023 by McAlister Family Law

Divorce and school fees – Will the court make my spouse pay?

One of the difficult parts of resolving financial issues in a divorce or separation is that, for most people, the lifestyle that they lead, their home and their expenditure is commensurate with the income which they have as a couple / family. Here, Lisa Brown breaks down how a financial dispute within a divorce can effect the school fees of children stuck in the middle.

When the couple split, that same income must suddenly run two homes rather than one and it is often the case that something has to give.

That might mean a change in the standard of holidays or cars or a smaller home but what happens when it is your child’s education at stake?

For some people trying to make the maths work on a separation, a private education becomes something which is perhaps no longer affordable and / or they may feel that other family expenditure should be prioritised. If both parties agree then potentially there is no issue but very often that is not the case.

Children, on the whole, are an emotional issue when parties separate and it may feel to one party that it is of the utmost importance that a child’s education and some consistency and normality be preserved.

On the other hand, fees for day schools are likely to be in the region of £15,000 per child per year. Boarding school will be more. Bearing in mind children can potentially be in education for 14 years this could mean a commitment in excess of £200,000 for each child. This is significant and very often there may be more than one child to consider.

So, what is the court’s view

At the outset I should say that the fundamental question of what school a child attends is not dealt with as part of the resolution of financial claims. The court on an application about finances can only resolve the issue of who pays. That may ultimately settle the dispute if the court declines to make an order and the person who wants the children to attend private education has no other method of paying but sometimes the objection is not just about the fees but the principle too.

If there was an issue whereby one party was saying that even if it were affordable the children would be better off in state education, then this would be an issue to be determined under the Children Act 1989 in line with the child or children’s best interests.

In circumstances where the only question is fees the court test is slightly different and although the children will always be the court’s first consideration there are a number of factors to look at known as the “section 25 factors” to consider and set out below:

(a) the income, earning capacity, property and other financial resources which each of the parties to the marriage has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future;

(b) the financial needs, obligations and responsibilities which each of the parties to the marriage has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future;

(d) the age of each party to the marriage and the duration of the marriage;

(e) any physical or mental disability of either of the parties to the marriage;

(f) the contributions which each of the parties has made or is likely in the foreseeable future to make to the welfare of the family, including any contribution by looking after the home or caring for the family;

(g) the conduct of each of the parties, if that conduct is such that it would in the opinion of the court be inequitable to disregard it (although this is not usually considered in reality in the vast majority of cases)

The primary issue with school fees is likely to be balancing income and needs to see whether it is affordable for school fees to be paid whilst also ensuring housing and other needs can be met.

Where the court feels school fees are affordable, they will make what is know as a “school fees order” obliging one or potentially both parties to pay all or a portion of the fees. This obligation is on top of any child maintenance and any spousal maintenance payable.

Can capital be set aside to pay for fees by the court?

The short answer is no. The court has no power to force parties to ring-fence a sum to pay for school fees. Parties can and do agree to do this or to put funds into trust for that purpose and, indeed, one of the benefits of coming to an agreed settlement is that it can be more sophisticated than the court which can be a blunt instrument. Legal advice should, however, be sought when considering this type of structure.

Grandparents have always paid- can the court force them to continue?

Again, the short answer is no. The court has no power to force a third party continue to meet school fees although it is possible, they will consider the way school fees have been met historically when making any decision overall.

What will a school fees order cover?

Standard wording might often cover “reasonable invoiced extras” perhaps specifically excluding exceptional items such as trips, but it is sensible to give consideration to what the expectation is. Are buses covered, lunches, uniform and so on?

Conclusion

There is no easy answer to this question, and it very much depends on the circumstances of the case including income / assets, how many children there are and where they are in their education.

It is important to look at the bigger picture and the outcome of your case generally. For example, carving out a school fees fund might seem attractive because it secures your child’s future, but it might prejudice your position overall if it is the case that those fees should really be being paid from your spouses’ income and the monies set aside in the fund should be divided between you meaning you would receive more capital.

Before reaching any final financial settlement whether in relation to school fees or anything else you should always speak to an experienced family solicitor. If you have any questions about this issue, or any other family law matter, please contact our team who would be happy to assist.